|




Vindication of Trust Feeling Good About Alternative Parenting Styles by Pauline Mary Curley
John Holt’s overriding
message in his pioneering book How Children Learn can be condensed into one very simple concept: Trust children.
He explains, however, that we adults find this difficult because “to trust children we must first learn to trust ourselves,
and most of us were taught as children that we could not be trusted.”
Coming face-to-face
with the realization that I actually had to learn how to trust myself was probably the most unexpected revelation of motherhood
for me. Nothing prepared me for the learning that would take place alongside my rite of passage into motherhood. The enormity
and the pace of it has been exponential, catapulting me headlong onto the steepest learning curve of my life!
Notwithstanding the
sheer volume of childrearing data and anecdotal evidence already available, I soon discovered that it was ultimately my responsibility,
both to my children and to myself, to make good parenting choices. I had to trust myself to sift through the barrage of information
and make wise decisions regarding my children.
I am eternally thankful
for the wisdom of the lactation consultant, Johanna, in our breastfeeding support group when my first daughter was born. “You
are your child’s best advocate,” she said repeatedly, trying to instill self-confidence in us new moms. Mainly,
she was addressing the difficulties and uncertainties we were experiencing as nursing moms in a bottle-feeding culture, but
her wise words have continued to serve me well in all areas of mothering.
Looking back over the
past eight years of motherhood, I recognize a pattern of learning which, if not exactly forced upon me, was certainly thrust
upon me, as I navigated my way through the various stages. It’s as if each stage wisened me up, toughened me up even,
in readiness for graduation to the next stage. In the words of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, “What we have to learn
to do, we learn by doing.”
Having swum against
the proverbial tide from the start in my parenting, I have placed myself well outside of what’s considered the norm
in our society, and often find motherhood a constant battle of wits against those who think they know what’s best for
me and my family! Those supposed experts – who stand in judgment, ready to pounce on my every move that doesn’t
meet with their approval – threaten to render me defenseless in the face of attack.
Ever the optimist,
though, I am sure that the external pressure I’ve had to overcome and the sometimes painful life lessons I’ve
learned have given me the confidence and strength I need to be true to myself in how I raise my children.
There is one particular
incident that epitomizes the developmental leap in my self-understanding and in my deeper understanding of others, although
at the time the incident occurred, I was too frazzled and upset to see it as anything but another nail in the coffin of my
desire to follow my heart in mothering.
We were staying with
my parents- in-law for a few days and my daughter Grace was in full toddler flight, at about two-and-a-half years old. Eleanor,
her sister, still a babe in arms, was inclined to charm adoring adults and not yet able to wreak havoc on the same scale as
her precocious and determined older sister. It was Sunday dinner, that holiest of family gatherings and, in addition to Grace’s
and Eleanor’s grandparents, a number of their uncles and aunts were also present for the occasion, quite possibly in
our honor as we were home in Ireland on vacation from the U.S.
I’m not clear
on the actual run-up to the particular incident, because I was busy nursing baby Eleanor and my husband was watching Grace.
Suddenly the pleasant family atmosphere was shattered and Grace was lying on the floor next to the dining table, kicking and
screaming, crying inconsolably, her chubby little legs flying indiscriminately, endangering anyone who dared to come near
her. Overwhelmed for whatever reason, not unusual for a toddler, she was beyond the point of reason and was not responding
well to verbal requests to stop kicking. Before I could register what was happening, my mother-in-law was taking control and
was ready to hit Grace, all the while shouting to my husband (her eldest son) about lack of discipline and the need to put
manners on her or we’d never be able to control her, how she’d walk all over us and we’d live to regret
it and so on.
In a blur, without
saying a word (although I’m sure the look on my face spoke a thousand words) I handed baby Eleanor over to my husband
and scooped Grace up into my arms lovingly. I left the room as quickly as possible, away from judging eyes and unwelcome interference.
I felt very alone, as the other family members at the table had either agreed openly with my mother- in-law or kept their
silence.
My immediate concern
was to protect Grace, to remove her from the situation before it degenerated further. Close to tears myself, we retreated
to the relative quiet of the sitting room, where I held Grace and nursed her back to peace and calm and, in doing so, managed
to recover some for myself too. Ironically, as the moments passed, I felt a sense of achievement that I had successfully turned
around a very uncomfortable situation and allowed everyone to escape with a certain amount of dignity intact: Grace recovered
and was soon back to her delightful, sociable and happy self; my initial anger and upset had given way to politeness for the
sake of keeping the peace; having quickly removed ourselves from the fray, I had minimized the negative impact on the rest
of the family.
After a relatively
short time, Grace and I returned to the fold and the matter was apparently forgotten. Everyone got on with eating dinner,
and a sense of normality was restored, on the surface at least. Although I had been able to regain my composure while nursing
Grace in the quiet of the other room, I was well aware that my resentment was bubbling just below the surface. Like lava in
a semi-dormant volcano, it wouldn’t have taken much for me to erupt into uncontrolled rage. I couldn’t trust myself
to have a calm and reasoned discussion and I was quite certain that no one else could either, given the chasm between us in
terms of parenting. So it seemed sensible to play along with the happy family facade.
I interrogated my husband
later, in private, to find out what had gone on after Grace and I had absented ourselves from the debate. In a rather defensive
manner, he explained that his mother had voiced her annoyance at Grace kicking and damaging her dining-room furniture and
that he was inclined to agree with her: Children should not be allowed to run amok like that and damage property, especially
other people’s property.
Initially, my husband
and I were entrenched in our own interpretations of what had transpired. He believed that the root of the problem was the
actual or potential damage to the furniture, was in sympathy with his mother and felt that we needed to employ stricter disciplinary
measures. I, on the other hand, was still confused and frustrated, feeling that somehow there was more to it than this.
I was churning inside:
On one level I could understand that it was not acceptable for Grace to kick her grandparents’ furniture and that we,
as parents, had a responsibility to teach our children to respect people and property; however, on another level, I felt that
everyone had overreacted since Grace was still a toddler at the time and, in any case, since she didn’t have shoes on,
couldn’t really inflict much lasting damage on solid wooden furniture. I was fighting emotional turmoil on two fronts:
my mother-in-law’s disapproval of and interference in our parenting and the fact that my husband and I were in disagreement
about how to deal with the issues involved.
Now, the relevance
of this story is not to show that my mother-in-law and I have very different approaches to parenting (in that regard, we’re
probably no different from most mothers and daughters-in-law), but to highlight and share the important lesson I learned from
the experience. In trying to make sense of it afterwards, and in trying to explain my frustrations to my husband, I gained
a sense of clarity and understanding that went beyond the kicking of the furniture and, indeed, beyond my own outrage and
fierce sense of maternal protectiveness towards my daughter.
What followed was a
liberating sense of relief. Instead of beating myself up over what was portrayed as our short- comings as parents or locking
myself into a position of superiority, I came to a place of honesty and enlightenment. I never doubted that removing Grace
and nursing her back to calm, rather than punishing her, was the correct response in the situation, but until then it was
simply a gut feeling. I hadn’t been able to decipher the real issues, hadn’t been able to differentiate between
what my mother- in-law was saying literally and the hidden meaning or agenda behind her words. With my newfound clarity, I
was able to articulate something that had previously been intangible.
I could see that the
true problem was not the potential damage to the furniture, but rather our response (or lack of response) to Grace’s
behavior. If my mother-in-law’s concern was the furniture, then my removing Grace from the room would have resolved
it and the matter would be laid to rest. However, the real issue here was a deeper and more fundamental one, and the fuss
over the furniture was simply an excuse used to justify my mother-in-law’s outburst. Hers was not a genuine grievance
– it was about power and control, about her way being the only way. Rather than trying to help and offer the benefit
of her experience, her comments exposed a lack of compassion and respect for Grace and for us as parents. By removing Grace
from the room and away from the furniture, I had in effect, called her bluff!
The crux of the matter
was that my mother-in-law felt that we should have hit Grace, as punishment for her behavior. She wanted us to exert “proper
parental authority” over her. Used to a more controlling style of parenting, my mother-in-law was annoyed that she wasn’t
in charge in this particular situation; I had removed Grace to safety before she could take control or dictate further. So
complaining about the furniture was, in fact, disingenuous on her part, when the real bee in her bonnet was that we weren’t
meting out what she considered appropriate punishment.
What a moment of revelation
for me – an epiphany! A dramatic shift had occurred in my understanding. Instead of taking the negative comments at
face value, I took the time to look deeper and ask myself a couple of revealing questions: “What principles are underpinning
their criticism?” and “What beliefs are informing their opinions?”
By patiently unpicking
the events as objectively as possible, I was able to uncover the underlying messages and see the truth of the situation. Having
worked this out in the privacy of my own head and heart, I felt a huge sense of relief and, yes – if I’m honest
– vindication. However, I had no desire to use my hard-won insight to challenge my mother-in-law. Nor did I want to
engage in a parenting debate with her.
That I could successfully
look beyond the obvious, beyond the naked criticism, and identify the true core issues, was immensely rewarding and gratifying.
Any mother who has chosen to parent in a way that falls outside of our cultural norm knows the value of realizing that the
criticism leveled at us is empty and comes from sheer prejudice, closed-mindedness, ignorance and sometimes even arrogance.
My mother-in-law is
a very loving and devoted grandmother, who spends a lot of time with her grandchildren and they, in turn, love her very much.
So the purpose here is not to vilify her but to show how, through this one incident, I was able to come to a more mature and
perceptive understanding of my role as a mother. I learned a valuable lesson, one which I have drawn on many times since,
especially in areas relating to our ongoing controversial decision not to send our daughters to school. I feel that I have
grown as a result, not only as a parent, but also as a person. And I can move forward with integrity and an increased sense
of confidence.
So now when someone
tells one of my six- and eight-year-old daughters to stop running or to get down from that tree in case she hurts herself
or to put on shoes in case she injures her foot, I quickly run through my mental checklist to ascertain if she is genuinely
in danger or if it’s simply the case that this person feels that whatever my daughter is doing is inappropriate. I can
thus get an honest assessment of the situation and trust that my response is based on my own good judgment and not on someone
else’s definition of what’s right or acceptable.
As I now have a clearer
window into my mother-in-law’s parenting philosophy and the thinking that underpins her attitudes and opinions in such
matters, I can more easily come to terms with (though not always agree with) her ways. I try to differentiate between our
differences as mothers and her ability to be a loving grandmother to Grace and Eleanor. The realization that she and I are
on different planets in most areas of parenting has allowed me to stop wasting precious time and emotional energy trying to
gain her approval where it’s not humanly possible.
In terms of her commentary
on our parenting, I feel that she has lost credibility. Having seen beyond the smoke screen on this particular occasion, my
eyes have been opened. I am not prepared to entertain her criticisms as valid, and I no longer allow her comments to undermine
my thinking or my decision-making. Instead, I have the confidence to trust my own judgment in matters where I know that her
opinion is based on values and beliefs far removed from mine.
I have also learned
that I can rise above the implied criticism and hurtful accusations, seeing them not as a reflection on my parenting, but
rather a reflection on her inability to trust my husband and me, as grown adults and parents in our own right, to make sensible
and thoughtful decisions about how we raise our children. Lessons like that don’t come from books or even from good
teachers, but have to be learned through living life with all its ups and downs.
| Pauline Mary Curley is an Irish unschooling mom, lucky enough
to divide her time between the West of Ireland and New Jersey. In a previous life in Europe (pre-children), she worked as
a structural engineer, a trade union representative, an adult literacy and numeracy teacher, and co-founded a Women’s
Center in Luton, England. She offers "All About Ireland" homeschool
workshops and one of her dreams is to encourage North American life learning families to visit and explore Ireland. Visit
her website. |
|
 |
|
For coach, a feeling of vindication
BY MIKE SZOSTAK
Journal
Sports Writer
SMITHFIELD — Angry and bitter for a few months after he
was forced to resign as lacrosse coach at Duke University last April in the wake of rape charges against three of his players,
Mike Pressler revealed the depth of his feelings only to family and close friends.
Despite numerous requests to comment publicly, even as the prosecution’s
case crumbled and he started a new career as head coach at Bryant University, Pressler remained silent.
Until yesterday, when his emotion poured like bubbles from a
freshly uncorked bottle of champagne.
Gripping a piece of paper on which he had condensed 13 months
of thought into 13 lines and speaking with a resolve that was almost palpable, Pressler celebrated the fact that truth —
“the same truth today as it was a year ago” — had finally prevailed in a case that rocked one of the nation’s
prestigious universities, raised issues of class, race and athletics elitism and shattered the lives of 47 young men and their
families, and the woman who alleged that three of them had raped her.
“The injustice, the lies and the myths have been fully
exposed,” Pressler told a gathering of regional and national media and Bryant administrators and students in the circular
Grand Hall of the Bello Center. He spoke for a little more than two hours before his Bulldogs played Bentley and a little
more than two hours after North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper announced that the state was dropping charges of sexual
offense and kidnapping against David Evans, Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty, and that based on a thorough review of the
evidence, they were innocent of all charges.
Rape charges were dropped in December after the woman said she
could not testify that a penis had penetrated her, one of the factors defining rape under North Carolina law.
“I am thrilled, overjoyed and relieved for Dave Evans,
Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann and their families. They have suffered greatly and unjustly. I am so proud of their resolve,
their strength and the first-class manner in which they handled this entire episode,” Pressler said, adding that he
hopes all the Duke players and their families “affected by this horrific situation” can move on.
Last March an exotic dancer, a mother of two and student at
predominantly black North Carolina Central University, was hired to perform at an off-campus party organized by the nationally
ranked lacrosse team. She alleged that three players raped her in a bathroom. Duke President Richard H. Brodhead canceled
the season, suspended a player for sending a hateful e-mail and commissioned several reports, one of which exonerated Pressler
of wrongdoing.
Pressler, Duke’s coach for 16 seasons and the NCAA Division
I national coach of the year in 2005, resigned under pressure on April 5, 2006.
District Attorney Michael Nifong, running for election last
year, continued to press the case even though the alleged victim changed her story multiple times and two DNA tests were negative.
The state bar association filed ethics complaints against him in December and Cooper removed him from the case in January.
He faces trial by the state bar in June.
Asked what he would say to Nifong, Pressler replied: “I
was very confident that justice would be served, it will be served to all the people that it applies to, and what goes around
comes around and we’re counting on the powers that be in the State of North Carolina to make sure that it’s dealt
with accordingly.”
Anger and bitterness turned to joy and excitement, Pressler
said, when Bryant offered him the lacrosse job last August. Bryant President Ronald K. Machtley sat in the crowd yesterday.
“For Mike and for his players at Duke, it’s a fine
day to move on with their lives,” he said.
Pressler said that he is proud that his players told the truth
from the beginning— “Two days after this happened I knew what the truth was . . .” — that they stayed
together and none of them transferred. He was in Durham Tuesday for a memorial service for veteran Duke golf coach Rod Myers
and spoke to his former team at the invitation of its new coach, John Danowski. He would have remained there but for the Bryant-Bentley
game here last night.
He lamented that “so many folks were so quick to put their
agenda out there before looking at the facts. . . . I think the key thing is you got to step back, take a hard look at it,
squint at it, what’s the truth here and wait. When you have people’s lives in your hands and you’re talking
about that four-letter word that begins with an ‘r’ and all those things that go with it, you take a long hard
look at that, I would think.”
Although there will be no criminal trial, Pressler said he felt
he and his players were on trial for a couple of months last year.
“All of a sudden, the evidence starts coming out. And
all of a sudden, the rape charges are dropped in December. And all of a sudden, all of that’s playing out in the media
and then you see the pieces kind of turning around, maybe a 180 so to speak, in the public-opinion polls,” he said.
He brushed aside questions about his lawyer’s fees and
a possible wrongful dismissal lawsuit against Duke, saying, “Everybody’s got attorneys. They don’t give
themselves away . . . I’m working hard to beat Bentley at 7 o’clock tonight.”
Pressler said “it’s about staying the course here,
and I always said I’d finish my command when those guys were vindicated. And so today
at 2:30 my command at Duke University is concluded.”
One of the trio, Seligmann, might finish his lacrosse career
in Pressler’s neighborhood. Brown coach Lars Tiffany was recruiting him but could not be reached for comment yesterday.
Pressler has co-authored a book with Don Yaeger about the Duke
case. It’s Not About the Truth is due in bookstores in June.
mszostak@projo.com
source site: click here
State Senator finds vindication after Enron convictions.
THE guilty verdicts last Thursday in the conspiracy and fraud cases against Enron founder
Ken Lay and former chief executive Jeffrey Skilling won't help Californians recover any money, but some here are feeling a
measure of vindicationVINDICATION, civil law. The claim made
to property by the owner of it. 1 Bell's Com. 281, 5th ed. See Revendication. ..... Click the link for more information..
West Coast utilities are still trying
to recover $2 billion from Enron stemming from the 2002 electricity crisis.
State Sen. Debra BowenDebra Bowen (born October 27, 1955)
is a California politician from the Democratic Party. She has been California Secretary of State since January 8 2007. Prior
to becoming Secretary of State, she was a member of the California State Legislature from 1992 to 2006. ..... Click the link for more information., D-Redondo Beach, who
chaired the Senate energy committee during the energy crisis, said Lay and Skilling ran a Ponzi scheme A fraudulent investment plan in which the investments of later
investors are used to pay earlier investors, giving the appearance that the investments of the initial participants dramatically
increase in value in a short amount of time. .
"They ripped RiPPED are an alternative rock band from Burlington, Ontario,
Canada on Sextant Records/EMI Distribution. The band formed in 1994, and were originally called "Ripped Emotions". off
millions of California ratepayers, and cost thousands of people not just their jobs, but their hard-earned pensions as well,"
Bowen said. "Sending them to jail won't undue any of that, but it's a lot better than watching them laugh their way to the
bank and lining up tee times with our money."
Staff reporter Kate Berry can be reached at (323) 549-5225, ext. 228,
or at kberry@labusinessjournal.com
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|