|




Abused women less likely to be in stable relationships
Poor
women who are physically or sexually abused at some point in their lives are less likely to maintain stable intimate relationships, according to a new study of more than 2,500 women by sociologists from The Johns Hopkins University and Penn State University.
The women involved in the study said they want fair treatment and companionship from their partners, just like everybody does, the researchers said. Many of those who had been
abused as adults told ethnographers that they had decided to forgo marriage and cohabiting relationships, at least temporarily.
Those who were sexually abused in childhood were not as likely to avoid relationships altogether; rather, they tended to engage in a series of short-term, transient relationships, many of them
abusive.
While there is no evidence that abuse rates have increased, the number of women postponing intimate relationships may be growing, said Andrew Cherlin, the Griswold Professor of Public Policy at Johns Hopkins and lead author of the report,
"The Influence of Physical and Sexual Abuse on Marriage and Cohabitation," to be published in the Jan. 21 issue of American
Sociological Review.
"What's changed over the past few decades is the social context
of abuse," Cherlin said. "Women don't have to stay with abusive men anymore because they have alternatives to marriage."
The researchers, working
in Boston, Chicago and San Antonio as part of the long-term research project called "Welfare, Children and Families: A Three-City
Study," surveyed a random sample of 2,402 Hispanic, African American, and white women. Ethnographic research teams studied
another 256 women in depth for several years, observing day-to-day activities and conducting repeated interviews. All of the
women studied were the primary caregivers of at least one child.
52% of women in
the random-sample survey reported being physically or sexually abused at some point during their lives. 24% said they were sexually abused during childhood or adolescence. 42% of women who had never been abused were married at the time of the survey, compared to 22% of women who had ever been abused. Of the 256 women studied in depth, 1/6 - many of whom had been physically abused as adults - said they were taking a timeout from intimate relationships with men.
"Women's decision to take a timeout from such relationships is an important
one for policymakers to understand," said co-author Linda Burton, director of the ethnographic component and Penn State professor of human development and sociology.
"These women are not saying they will never enter intimate relationships again, but, rather, they need recovery and reflection time from abuse they experienced as adults to avoid entering a subsequent abusive relationship."
Cherlin and Burton suggest that reducing levels of sexual abuse and physical violence in families could increase the number of healthy, stable, long-term
unions. They argue that current marriage promotion policy debates at the federal and state levels, which tend to blame declining cultural values or unemployment for lower marriage rates among the poor, should also focus on the consequences of abuse.
Other authors are: Tera Hurt, University of Georgia; and Diane Purvin, Wellesley
College.
Funding support came from National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Administration on Developmental Disabilities, Administration for Children and Families,
Social Security Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, The Boston Foundation, The Annie E. Casey Foundation,
The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, The Lloyd A. Fry Foundation, Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, The Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Kronkosky Charitable Foundation,
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation,
and Woods Fund of Chicago.
To speak with Andrew Cherlin, contact Amy Cowles at 443-287-9960. To speak with Linda Burton,
contact Vicki Fong at vfong@psu.edu or 814-865-9481. For a copy of the report, e-mail amycowles@jhu.edu. Johns Hopkins University
|
 |
|
Genes May Make Men Less Monogamy-Friendly
Study: DNA May Make Them Less Capable Of Commitment In Marriage, Other Stable Relationships
Sept. 3, 2008
CBS) Some men may be more
predisposed than others -- by their genes -- to encounter difficulties in monogamous relationships, including marriage, a
Swedish study indicates.
The research out of Stockholm's Karolinska Institute suggests two-out-of-five men have the
DNA pattern that makes them less able to commit to a stable relationship, according to The
Early Show's Dr. Debbye Turner Bell.
And that, she points
out, raises the question of whether women would or should want to know beforehand which type of genetic mix they're getting
themselves into with a guy.
On The Early Show Wednesday, psychologist
Dr. Jennifer Hartstein addressed, among other things, whether these findings will give men one more excuse to fail to commit
fully.
Unmarried dads' involvement with child secured during pregnancy, study says
Published: Monday, December 15, 2008 - 12:29 in Psychology & Sociology
By Jay Fagan
The best chance of "reeling-in"
an unmarried father and building the foundations for a stable family life are the critical
months of pregnancy, says new research from the University of Maryland. "Unmarried dads are less likely to drift away if they
are involved with their partner during this vital period when a family can begin to bond," says University of Maryland human
development professor Natasha J. Cabrera, the principal investigator and a researcher at the school's Maryland Population
Research Center. click here
The study, published in the
December Journal of Marriage and Family, is the first to explain the importance of the pre-natal period in the formation
of non-traditional family patterns. The researchers analyzed data drawn from an ongoing project – the Fragile Families
Child Well Being Study – which mostly involved unmarried couples, a total of 1,686 couples in all. http://www.fragilefamilies.princeton.edu/
In their analysis, Cabrera
and her colleague, Jay Fagan at Temple University, found that fathers involved during pregnancy were significantly more likely
to remain involved in raising their child at age three. click here
"The unmarried father is much
more likely either to maintain or move into a more committed relationship if he's involved before the birth, and that's the
critical difference," Cabrera says. "As you might expect, research has consistently shown that creating a stable home life predicts whether a father will be an active participant in raising the child, but what we've
learned here is that the pre-natal months are when that kind of family structure is most likely to coalesce."
The study found that marital
status is not a critical predictor of a father's involvement. "It is the decision that couples make to strengthen commitment
and move in together that is important, rather than marital status per se," Cabrera said. "You don't need much imagination
to see that a live-in dad is likely to be more involved in child care and family life. It's the personal investment in the
child's and the mother's future that counts the most, not the paperwork."
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|